Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of M.J.M.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 2009No. A08-0998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant M.J.M. challenges the district court’s orders revoking the stay of adjudication over his juvenile delinquency proceedings. He claims that the district court’s jurisdiction expired 180 days after the court ordered the stay, consistent with Minn. R. Juv. Delinq. P. 15.05, subd. 4(B). Because a district court’s jurisdiction over a juvenile delinquency matter terminates 180 days after the date it was continued without adjudication, and because subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

On November 1, 2006, appellant pleaded guilty to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Dead Lake Ass'n, Inc. v. Otter Tail CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. LoshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. In Re the Welfare of J.R.Z.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. J.E.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amanda Jean Lunzer v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  2. In re C. S. N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  3. Nicholas Robert Schimmel v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API