Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Mortell
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 21, 1989No. 88 C 9285PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this consolidated action seek recovery under certain provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs’ four-count consolidated complaint alleges that defendants committed certain improprieties in connection with the management of an employee profit sharing plan in which plaintiffs participated. The parties agreed to a bench trial, which was held from July 24 to July 26 of 1989. Having heard all of the evidence presented at trial, and having considered the arguments made by the parties, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Donovan v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Stephen D. Kleinhans v. Lisle Savings Profit Sharing TrustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Turner v. CF&I STEEL CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Lieske v. MorlockDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Brock v. TIC International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reich v. LancasterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Petri v. GatlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Tracey v. Heublein, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- Martin v. MurphyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1993
- Robert B. Reich, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Jerry D. Lancaster, Jerry D. Lancaster and Jerry D. Lancaster & Associates, Inc. v. Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 454 Health & Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995