Martin v. Murphy
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS DENNIS MURPHY, ROBERT PREBIANCA, RAY TOFFOLI, and GEORGE GARBARINO’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HIGHSMITH, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants Dennis Murphy, Robert Prebianca, Ray Toffoli, and George Garbarino’s (“Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment. As grounds for their motion for summary judgment, the Defendants assert that this action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies Defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Lynn Martin, Secretary'of- Labor for the United States…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ronald Fink v. National Savings and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Anderson v. MortellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reich v. LancasterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Meyer v. Berkshire Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Robert B. Reich, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Jerry D. Lancaster, Jerry D. Lancaster and Jerry D. Lancaster & Associates, Inc. v. Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 454 Health & Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995