Legal Opinion
Tracey v. Heublein, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 23, 1991No. Civ. H-90-936 (AHN)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
NEVAS, District Judge.
In this one-count action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., John F. Tracey, Jr. (“Tracey”) sues his former employer, Heublein, Inc. (“Heublein”), for the recovery of certain pension plan benefits. Heublein now moves to dismiss the substituted complaint. For the reasons that follow, the court grants Heublein’s motion to dismiss.
I. Applicable Standards
When considering a motion to dismiss the court accepts as true all factual allegations in the complaint and draws inferences from these…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fisher v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Sue De La Cruz v. James TormeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Boone v. Leavenworth Anesthesia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Brooks v. Metrica, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Brown v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
- Damon v. Unisys Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.