Legal Opinion

J.C. Penney Co. v. Commissioner of Economic Security

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 1984No. C0-84-461PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This case comes before us on a writ of certiorari from a decision by the Commissioner of Economic Security interpreting the statutory and administrative definitions of “wages” subject to unemployment tax. The Commissioner’s representative determined that payments made by an employer to a savings and profit-sharing retirement plan are “wages” for unemployment tax purposes where the payments constitute part of the employee’s compensation and are deposited at the employee’s request. We reverse.

FACTS

Relator J.C. Penney Co., Inc., an.employer with offices in this state,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. W. H. Barber Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Minnesota Microwave, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Dumont v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Claim for Benefits by MeulenersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Hearing Regarding the Peace Officer License of WoollettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. In Re the Claim for Benefits by SloanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Erdman v. Life Time Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API