Legal Opinion

Erdman v. Life Time Fitness, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 25, 2009No. A08-1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge. *

This appeal is taken from an order denying a motion by appellant Life Time Fitness, Inc. (Life Time) for summary judgment dismissing a certified class claim asserted by respondent Sarah Erdman under the Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act (MFLSA). The district court concluded that a bonus plan allowing payroll deductions for bonus amounts advanced but not earned precluded Life Time from claiming exemptions from the MFLSA as a matter of law. Because we conclude that the district court erred in interpret ing the MFLSA, we reverse and remand for entry of judgment in favor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erdman v. LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Deutsch v. My Pillow, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
  3. Deutsch v. My Pillow, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API