Legal Opinion
W. H. Barber Co. v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 15, 1948No. Nos. 34,637, 34,638PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action by W. H. Barber Company, a corporation, against the city of Minneapolis to have adjudged valid a certain building permit theretofore issued by the city for the construction of an additional floor to a one-story office building on certain real estate belonging to plaintiff, and to enjoin the city from interfering with the construction of such addition.
The city denied plaintiff’s allegations that the real estate had been zoned for “light industrial” uses so as to permit the construction of the described addition, and at the trial it presented evidence that under…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- City of Amarillo v. StapfTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. BrandenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Edge v. City of BellaireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Harrell v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.