Legal Opinion
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Sloan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 3, 2007No. A06-531PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
Pursuant to a timely filed petition for writ of certiorari, relator Alexander Sloan challenges the Public Safety Officers Benefits Eligibility Panel’s denial of his petition for continued employer-provided health-insurance benefits. Because we conclude that relator was discharging his occupational duty or professional responsibility when he suffered his disabling injury, we reverse.
FACTS
Relator Alexander B. Sloan was a 21-year veteran of the University of Minnesota Police Department before he suffered a career-ending back injury. On October 8, 2001, in the wake of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Claim for Benefits by HagertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re the Claim for Benefits by SlettenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re the Claim for Benefits by SloanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In the Matter of the Duty Disability Benefits for Matthew Olson.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014