Legal Opinion

In Re Cotton Yarn Antitrust Litigation

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided November 9, 2005No. Civ.A.1:04 MD 1622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BEATY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This multidistrict litigation is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint as to Certain Plaintiffs and Compel Arbitration, and to Stay the Case as to the Remaining Plaintiffs [Document # 9]. Plaintiffs are individuals and entities that purchased cotton yarn in the United States from Defendants Frontier Spinning Mills, LLC, Frontier Spinning Mills, Inc., and Frontier, Inc. (collectively “Frontier”) and Defendants Avondale Mills, Inc. and Avondale, Inc. (collectively “Avondale”) (Frontier and Avondale, collectively,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Cotton Yarn Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. Simpson v. MSA of Myrtle Beach, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Atlantic Textiles v. Avondale Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API