Atlantic Textiles v. Avondale Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohnston, District Judge
I concur in Part I, Part 11(A), and Part 11(B)(1) of the majority opinion. I respectfully dissent, however, from Part 11(B)(2), Part 11(B)(3), and the result that this case should be remanded for further proceedings in the district court, as described in the majority opinion.
I
The majority opinion acknowledges that federal statutory claims are subject to arbitration if the litigants can effectively vindicate their substantive statutory claims in the arbitral forum. The majority concludes that the Antitrust Act’s four-year limitations period, 15 U.S.C. § 15b, is not a “substantive right” and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kristian v. Comcast Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.