Legal Opinion

Mousa v. Saba

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 20, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 08-0276PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSEN, Judge.

¶ 1 Under Arizona ' Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 32-2122 (2008), one may not act as a real estate broker without a license. At issue in this case is an alleged contract for the performance of several services, some of which plainly fell within the licensing requirement and some of which arguably did not. In a suit to recover compensation allegedly due under the contract, the superior court entered summary judgment for the defendants, ruling that A.R.S. § 32-2152(A) (2008) precluded recovery. We hold that when a contract is illegal in part but not divisible, a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eller Media Co. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. DanielsArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Landi v. ArkulesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Loiselle v. COSAS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Longnecker v. American Express Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2014
  3. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Rice v. Brakel, M.D., Center for NeurosciencesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. KCI Restaurant Management LLC v. Holm Wright Hyde & Hays PLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API