Legal Opinion

Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. Aiken

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 26, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 91-0657PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEISBERG, Judge.

OPINION

Thomas and Patricia Aiken (“defendants”) appeal from the portion of the trial court’s judgment finding that Thomas’ separate property is liable for health care expenses incurred by his wife because of an agreement he signed. For the reasons stated below, we reverse this portion of the judgment and remand for trial on this issue.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Patricia was hospitalized at Phoenix Baptist Hospital and Medical Center, Inc. (“the hospital”). When the hospital did not receive payment of its bill, it filed suit seeking judgment not only against Patricia,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Broemmer v. Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Brookover v. Roberts Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Estate of Nelson v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Mobilisa, Inc. v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API