Legal Opinion
Longnecker v. American Express Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 28, 2014No. 2:14-cv-0069-HRHPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
H. RUSSEL HOLLAND, District Judge.
Motion to Compel Arbitration
Defendants move to compel arbitration.1 This motion is opposed.2 Oral argument was requested and has been heard.
*1103 Background,
Plaintiffs are Jonathan Longnecker, Er-andi Acevedo, Jennifer Flynn, Bonita Ka-thol, and Janet Seitz.3 Defendants are American Express Company and AMEX Card Services Company.
Plaintiffs are former employees at defendants’ Phoenix call center. In their complaint, plaintiffs allege that defendants have violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) because defendants did not pay overtime for pre-shift work and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pinto v. USAA Insurance Agency Inc. of Texas (FN)District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Grasso Enters., LLC v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
- Bell v. Ryan Transportation Service, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- Aldrete v. Berkshire Hathaway Automotive IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Barnett v. V.T. Motors LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.