Legal Opinion
Landi v. Arkules
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 9, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 89-361, 1 CA-CV 89-505PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
Defendants filed separate notices of appeal from a judgment entered by the superior court in favor of the plaintiffs and from the superior court’s denial of defendants’ motion for a new trial. We consolidated these appeals for decision.
Defendants have presented three issues for review:
1) Did the trial court properly apply Arizona law rather than New York or Illinois law in interpreting an “heir finder” agreement?
2) Did the trial court err in finding that the “heir finder” contract was unenforceable as contrary to public policy?
3) Are the defendants entitled to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Woerth v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Gary Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Sun Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Hunt v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Nelson v. McGoldrickWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Harte-Hanks Direct Marketing/Baltimore, Inc. v. Varilease Technology Finance Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- In Re TaylorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Mousa v. SabaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.