Legal Opinion

Devaughn v. Byrom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 4, 1900PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Money rule. ■ Before Judge Littlejohn. Dooly superior court. September term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

DeVaughn brought in the justice’s court a rule against Bowen as constable, claiming a fund in the hands of the latter. Byrom became a party to the proceeding by intervention, and set up a claim to the fund. The case was by consent *905appealed to the superior court, where the issues involved were submitted to the decision of the judge without the intervention of a jury. At the hearing the following facts appeared: On June 18, 1896, Sam Rowell executed and delivered to 'DeVaughn a mortgage upon a mule to secure a debt of $150, and on January 7, 1897, executed and delivered to Byrom a mortgage upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thornton v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. Craig v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. National Bank v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Moore, Marsh & Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Harwell v. FittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dozier v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Ting v. BornHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Quitman Oil Co. v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  4. Towson v. HornSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Hughes v. Mount Vernon BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API