Ting v. Born
Hawaii Supreme Court
Motion to Quash Writ ok Error.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
DE BOLT, X
A writ of error to tbe circuit court of tbe second circuit having issued to review a judgment entered in an action wherein Alfred K. Ting (tbe defendant in error) was plaintiff and *639Earnest 0. Born (the plaintiff in error), was defendant and the First National Bank of Wailuku was garnishee, the defendant in error, xipon the record being filed in this court pursuant to the writ, filed a motion to quash the writ and dismiss the proceedings in error on the following grounds: (1) that the judgment and execution thereon are fully satisfied; (2) that the garnishee is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dakota County v. GliddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Kanawha & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Juilliard v. MayIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Compass Development, Inc. v. BlevinsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
- Robinson v. KaaeHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re KakaakoHawaii Supreme Court · 1928
- Novite v. Ham PongHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re Appeal of GoodfaderHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.