Legal Opinion
Towson v. Horn
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 15, 1925No. 4877PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
1. The defendant in error moves to dismiss the writ of error, because the sheriff and the defendant in the trover suit are necessary parties, but are not parties to the bill of exceptions. In the turn which the ease finally took, and as no judgments were rendered against these parties, they were nominal parties, and the bill of exceptions will not be dismissed because they are not made parties. DeVaughn v. Byrom, 110 Ga. 904 (36 S. E. 267); Civil Code (1910), § 6176; Weaver v. Bank of Bowersville, 146 Ga. 142 (90 S. E. 864).
2. The first six grounds of the amendment to the motion for new trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Devaughn v. ByromSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Weaver v. Bank of BowersvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Wooten v. WestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis-Pickett Chevrolet, Inc. v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Briesenick v. DimondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Horn v. TowsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. GianotosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Gardner v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.