Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Mount Vernon Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1908No. 790PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Money rule, from city court of Mount Vernon — Judge Geiger. September 9, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

The Mount Vernon Bank held four notes secured by a mortgage on real estate. The bank sued the notes to judgment and had the execution levied on thepnortgaged property. It was agreed between the mortgagor and the mortgagee that the entire estate should be sold. Just before the sale, the plaintiff in *24error lodged with, the sheriff a general judgment against the mortgagor, of date younger than the mortgage but older than the judgment based on the mortgage debt, and notified the sheriff to hold up the funds. The property was then sold; and all parties admit that it brought full value. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butler & Vosburgh v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  2. Devaughn v. ByromSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Torrey v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Harwell v. FittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  5. Hynds Mfg. Co. v. Oglesby & Meador Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CastlenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Kirkland v. KirklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Allen v. Community Loan & Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Thomasville Live Stock Co. v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Bertram v. Mason City Production Credit Ass'n (In Re Berthram)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API