Legal Opinion

L. C. James Motor Co. v. Wetmore

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1930No. Civil No. 2875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an action by Helen M. Wetmore for damages based upon fraud and deceit claimed to have been practiced upon her by the defendant motor company in selling her a two-ton Graham Brothers truck for $2,317.84. The allegations of fraud are, in effect, that plaintiff Helen M. Wetmore on November 1, 1926, contemplated buying an automobile truck that “would draw and pull a certain well drilling outfit” then owned by her and her husband, B. A. Wet-more; that they applied to defendant to buy a Graham Brothers two-ton truck, stating the purpose for which it was to be used; that defendant’s general…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mills v. Magee Carpet Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. GastelumArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hexter v. BastSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Cox v. HighleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  5. Palmberg v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lutfy v. R. D. Roper & Sons Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Pinnacle Peak Developers v. TRW Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local 395 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hatco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Reay v. BeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Tovrea Equipment Co. v. GobbyArizona Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API