Palmberg v. City of Astoria
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
As stated in Palmberg v. Astoria, 101 Or. 224 (199 Pac. 630, 16 A. L. R. 1125):
‘‘This is an action to recover damages which the plaintiff claims to have sustained by reason of error committed by the defendant through mistake in materially understating in its specifications the amount of embankment required to complete an improvement upon a street of defendant city, by reason of which misrepresentation the plaintiff was induced to bid a lower sum for completing the improvement and to expend a greater sum of money therefor than would have been necessary had the conditions been as specified in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Anderson v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Wimer v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1892
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Dallas v. ShortallTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. McCormickOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Inland Construction Co. v. City of PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Clark v. City of Humansville, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Williams v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.