Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Gastelum

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1929No. Civil No. 2802PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

In this action Diego Gastelum seeks to recover from the Southern Pacific Company, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Law (45 U. S. C. A., §§51-59), damages suffered by him as a result of an injury received while discharging his duty as an employee of that company. He won a verdict for $1,500 and was awarded judgment in that sum, but feeling this inadequate moved for a new trial of the amount of damages alone. The defendant likewise moved for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but the coiirt denied both of its motions and at the same time announced that plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Mills v. Magee Carpet Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Murray v. KrenzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Jarrett v. High Point Trunk & Bag Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Trambly v. RicardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Wallace v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Dansby v. BuckArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hallford v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API