Legal Opinion

Mills v. Magee Carpet Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 13, 1916PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugG, C. J.

The only question presented on this record is whether the motion for a new trial was granted lawfully by the Superior Court judge.*

The action is in contract. The only issue contested before the jury was the liability of the defendant. Opposing counsel agreed in their arguments at the trial and the judge charged the jury in effect that there was no dispute as to damages, and that, if a verdict were returned for the plaintiff, it should be for the sum of $1,200. A verdict was rendered for $204.37. A motion for a new trial was filed seasonably, alleging five grounds of error, the last of which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Riggs v. . PursellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. FerebeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Karrick v. WetmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Service Publications, Inc. v. GovermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API