Legal Opinion

Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local 395 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hatco, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 7, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 6101PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Judge.

Three questions are presented in this appeal:

1. Does the mere fact of agreement between signatories to the Master Labor Agreement (MLA) that “owner-operators” are employees for the purposes of determining the employer’s contributions to the various union trust funds (Trust Funds) suffice to make the owner-operators employees notwithstanding § 2(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 152(3)?

2. Did the trial court err in finding that because the owner-operators were employees in fact the employer was required to make contributions to the Trust Funds…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Home Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Jerger v. RubinArizona Supreme Court · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Swichtenberg v. BrimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. London v. Green Acres TrustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. State v. One Single Family Residence At 1810 East Second AvenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API