Petty v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
The question is: Where an insurance policy for less than $5,000, issued after medical examination, has lapsed and has been reinstated upon false written representation of insured, and without medical examination, can the policy, as reinstated, be canceled without allegation and proof of fraud in the making of such representation? We think so.
All contracts of insurance on lives in this State shall be deemed to be made therein and subject to the laws of the State. O. S., 6287-6288. It is provided in C. S., 6289: “All statements or descriptions in any application for a policy of insurance, or in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bryant v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Schas v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Leaksville Woolen MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Chavis v. Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Thomas-Yelverton Co. v. State Capital Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Rhinehardt v. North Carolina Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. AshbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.