Legal Opinion
Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 5, 1952No. 315PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, C. J.
The written application signed by the insured upon which the policy of insurance was issued contained the following questions and answers:
“29. Have you ever had eleetro-cardiographic or X-ray studies made? 29. No.
“31. A. Has a physician or other practitioner examined you within 2 months? 31. A. No.
“32. B. Have you had any reason, during the past six months, to think you might be physically impaired, temporarily or otherwise? 32. B. No.
“34. For what have you consulted, or been attended by a physician or surgeon or other practitioner during the past seven years? None.”
There was evidence offered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gardner v. North State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Bryant v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Schas v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Leaksville Woolen MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Modisette v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Northern National Life Insurance v. Lacy J. Miller MacHine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.