Crosby v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice.
In a jury trial in Superior Court, the appellant, Robert T. Crosby, Jr., was found guilty of selling a narcotic drug in violation of 16 Del.C. § 4725. He seeks a reversal of that conviction, alleging that the undisputed evidence clearly established entrapment, wherefore the Court below should have directed a verdict in his favor.
The State’s evidence was this: On November 18, 1970, about five o’clock in the afternoon, police officer Gray, accompanied by an informant who was a young girl, went to the home of one Warner. The two of them were dressed like “bums”. The girl stated to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. LaiettaNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Longoria v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Quillen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- State v. BrownSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. AndersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Cane v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Atkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.