Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 31, 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUILLEN, Judge.

The defendant, Diane Johnson Brown, was found guilty by a jury of two counts of sale of marijuana. The defense has filed a "Motion for Verdict of Acquittal Notwithstanding the Verdict of the Jury or, in the Alternative, a New Trial”. The defendant claims she was entitled to a directed verdict of acquittal because of entrapment and further that the charge to the jury placing the burden on the defendant on entrapment by a preponderance of the evidence was plain error requiring a new trial even in the absence of an exception.

The question of entrapment was a factual one and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Paul A. Gorin v. United States of America, Henry Grillo v. United States of America, Saul Glassman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
  3. People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. United States v. Rufus Eafie HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Koptyra v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moody v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. State v. SwainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. Crosby v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API