Legal Opinion

People v. Laietta

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1972PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBkeitel, J.

The issue in this criminal action is whether the trial court erred in charging the jury that the defendant had the burden of persuasion on the defense of entrapment.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of conspiracy (Penal Law, § 105.10), and attempted grand larceny by extortion (Penal Law, §§ 110.00, 155.40), and sentenced to concurrent maximum terms of three years. The Appellate Division affirmed.

The order should be affirmed. Section 25.00 (sube). 2) of the Penal Law places on the defendant the burden of establishing affirmative defenses'; such as entrapment, by a preponderance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. FelixNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. People v. StanleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. HochbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API