Legal Opinion

Goulding v. Cook

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 13, 1996PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

The plaintiffs in this case (Gouldings) sought an injunction in the Land Court, enjoining the defendants (Cooks) to end a trespass on their property. The parties own neighboring residences in Scituate. When installation of another neighbor’s swimming pool caused the Cooks’s cesspool, which was partly under that neighbor’s land, to malfunction, they were forced to find an alternative sewage disposal system. The town required a septic system, and the only suitable site for such a system was on a 2,998 square foot triangle of land that the Cooks claimed belonged to them but which the Gouldings…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Illinois Commerce Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Feinzig v. FicksmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Brandao v. DoCantoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  4. Amaral v. CuppelsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. Capodilupo v. VozzellaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API