Legal Opinion

Amaral v. Cuppels

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 22, 2005No. 04-P-569PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Since 1981, the defendants have owned and operated a private golf course in Rehoboth known as the Middle-brook Country Club (Middlebrook). In the late 1990’s, the plaintiffs moved into newly constructed homes adjacent to the ninth hole of the course. After moving into their homes, both plaintiffs discovered that errant golf balls struck by golfers playing the course came onto their properties with alarming frequency, and after unsuccessfully attempting to negotiate a mutually acceptable resolution with the defendants, the plaintiffs *86sought injunctive relief and damages in the Superior Court.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peters v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Sheppard Envelope Co. v. Arcade Malleable Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Hennessy v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Pendoley v. FerreiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Goulding v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rattigan v. WileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Fish v. Accidental Auto Body, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  3. Field v. Hughes-Birch (In re Hughes-Birch)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  4. Far Hills Ass'n v. CorreiaMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010
  5. Genova v. CornellMassachusetts Land Court · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API