Legal Opinion
Spine v. BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 16, 2010No. Civil Action 08-1827 (CKK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
This case involves a dispute between Plaintiff Stryker Spine (“Stryker”), a French corporation, and Defendants Biedermann Motech GmbH (“Biedermann”) and DePuy Spine, Inc. (“DePuy”), over a patent interference proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Stryker seeks judicial review of decisions made by the PTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146. Pending before the Court are a series of dispositive motions. Stryker has filed a[31] Motion for Summary Judgment regarding the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Campbell v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Agri-Labs Holding LLC v. Taplogic, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2018
- Stryker Spine v. Biedermann Motech GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Campbell v. Natl Railroad PassDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Spine v. Biedermann Motech GmbhDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010