Legal Opinion

Stryker Spine v. Biedermann Motech GmbH

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 15, 2010No. Civil Action 08-1827 (CKK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

This case involves a dispute between Plaintiff Stryker Spine (“Stryker”), a French corporation, and Defendants Biedermann Motech GmbH (“Biedermann”) and DePuy Spine, Inc. (“DePuy”), over a patent interference proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Stryker seeks judicial review of decisions made by the PTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the “Board”) pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146. In a prior ruling issued on February 16, 2010, the Court denied Stryker’s motions for summary judgment and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
Voda v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
In Re Denis Rouffet, Yannick Tanguy and Frederic BerthaultCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Dome Patent, L.P. v. ReaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014