Legal Opinion

Spine v. Biedermann Motech Gmbh

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 15, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2008-1827Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STRYKER SPINE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08–1827 (CKK) BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 15, 2010) This case involves a dispute between Plaintiff Stryker Spine (“Stryker”), a French corporation, and Defendants Biedermann Motech GmbH (“Biedermann”) and DePuy Spine, Inc. (“DePuy”), over a patent interference proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Stryker seeks judicial review of decisions made by the PTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the “Board”)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Voda v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re Denis Rouffet, Yannick Tanguy and Frederic BerthaultCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API