Legal Opinion

Barlow v. City Bus Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1948PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The question for decision is whether the evidence survives the demurrer. The trial court answered in the negative. We are inclined to a different view.

The case was made to turn in the court below on the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. Opposing inferences seem permissible from the evidence, especially in view of the ambiguity in the testimony of the Highway Patrolman who investigated the occurrence, and in this state of the record the decisions require that the case be submitted to the jury.

The two vehicles were proceeding in the same direction in the nighttime, through fog and rain,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Shell v. . RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Williams v. Frederickson Motor Express Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Cummins v. Southern Fruit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Keener v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Bridges v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Essick v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API