Legal Opinion

Essick v. City of Lexington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1951No. 672PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The only assignment of error brought forward by the defendants City of Lexington and Lexington Utility Commission was the denial of their motion for judgment of nonsuit.

It was not controverted that the City of Lexington in its corporate capacity owned and operated electric light and power lines, and that the Utility Commission was an incorporated agency of the City charged with supervision and management thereof. The plaintiff’s intestate was a carpenter, in the employ of the Dixie Furniture Company and was engaged at the time of his injury in putting a metal cap on the top of the roof over…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Essick v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Haney v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API