Legal Opinion
Miller v. Port of New York Authority
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 20, 1939PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ackerson, S. 0. C.
The fourteen plaintiffs (husband and wives being joined in several instances), represent ten different ownership interest in ten separate and distinct pieces of real property adjacent to the Midtown Tunnel in Hudson county, also known as the Lincoln Tunnel. These owners have brought this action against the Port of Hew York Authority (hereinafter called the “Authority”), under whose power said tunnel was constructed, as well as against several contractors who were instrumental in its construction under agreements with the Authority.
The complaint, consisting of three counts,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Helvering v. GerhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Highway Comm. of Wyoming v. Utah Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Allen v. Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Orbison v. WELSH, GOVERNORIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Howell v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- PORT AUTHORITY OF NY AND NJ v. BoscoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.