Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 20, 1961PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WBiísrTEAUB, C. J.

The trial court ordered pretrial discovery of statements which defendants McNamara and Stevens gave the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor (herein Commission). State v. Murphy, 63 N. J. Super. 188 (Cty. Ct. 1960). The order deals as well with notes or memoranda of examinations of defendants, but since no such papers exist, we are concerned only with the stenographic transcript of their testimony before the agency.

The statements, made in the course of an investigation conducted by the Commission, were part of the material the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. KahanerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. State v. LaganellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. State v. Habeeb Robinson(078900) (Essex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  4. Ballinger v. Delaware River Port AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  5. State v. CookSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API