Legal Opinion

Howell v. Port of New York Authority

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 28, 1940No. Civ. 435PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, District Judge.

1. The complaint filed herein alleges: The Port of New York Authority (hereinafter referred to as “The Authority”) deposited funds with the Ocean City National Bank (hereinafter referred to as “Bank”) at various times, and the Bank secured said deposits with certain negoti.able securities, a part of which were sold .after the bank suspended business and from the proceeds thereof The Authority was paid the full amount' to its credit at the time business was suspended and the difference was remitted to the Bank, to.gether with the unsold securities.

2. The Bank, by its…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Helvering v. GerhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Allison v. CorkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  4. County Commissioners v. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Ross v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Patrick Feeney v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. The Port Authority Police Benevolent Association, Inc. v. The Port Authority Of New York And New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. Vittorio Mineo, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API