Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1
Supreme Court of the United States
Prohibition, to restrain proceedings in admiralty in the District Court. The case is stated in the opinion, post, 494.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
Three separate libels in rem were filed in the United States District Court for the. Western District of New York: two against the Steam Tug Charlotte, her engines, boilers, machinery, etc., by one Dolloff and one Wagner respectively, both residents and presumably citizens of the State of New York, to severally recover for damages alleged to have been caused to certain canal boats owned by them while navigated upon the Erie Canal in tow of the Charlotte; the other against the Steam Tug Henry Koerber, Jr., her boilers, engines, tackle, etc., by Murray Transportation Company, a coloration of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by555 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
550 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.