Legal Opinion
In Re Ankelis
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
On April 26, 1939, Oregon State Bar filed an amended complaint accusing I. G. Ankelis of unprofessional conduct as an attorney at law and asking that he he permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Oregon.
After setting forth that Ankelis is an attorney at law, duly admitted by the supreme court to practice law in this state, the amended complaint contains the following allegations: that on December 2, 1938, an indictment was returned by the United States grand jury in the district court of the United States for the district of Oregon charging Ankelis with the crime of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Ex parte BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- In re MarronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. PrendergastOregon Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of EvingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Gladden v. SloperOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re KingOregon Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.