Legal Opinion

In re Marron

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1917No. 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On motion to retax costs.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, C. J.

The respondents have filed a motion in this case to retax the costs, on the theory that the taxation of costs against them by the clerk was without authority of law. In 6 C. J. 613, it is said:

“In the absence of statute giving costs in such cases (disbarment), the general rule is that none can be recovered by either party.”

In 2 Thornton on Attorneys at Law, § 895, it is said that costs are the creatures of statute, and the general rule is that none can be recovered in disbarment eases, in the absence of statutory authority therefor. See, also, 4 Cyc. 917, and cases cited in each of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Trust & Savings Bank v. Hermosa Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Reck v. Robert E. McKee General Contractors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Banes Agency v. ChinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re AnkelisOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Banes Agency v. ChinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API