Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Johns

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1958PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disbarment proceeding.

Petitioner, Claude M. Johns, an attorney of this court, was convicted on a plea of guilty in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon on two counts charging violation of § 145 (a), Title 26, USC, Internal Revenue Code of 1939, in that he willfully and knowingly failed to make income tax returns to the Director of Internal Revenue. The first count related to the income tax return required to he made before March 15, 1953, and the second to the return required to be made before March 15,1954. As alleged in the information, his gross income for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Hargrove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. State v. ZukauskasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  4. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MeansOregon Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BromwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against GreinerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In Re CorcoranOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API