Board of Supervisors v. . Ellis
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The evidence is slight, if any, that there was ever any legal and proper audit and allowance of these bills. But as we do not put our decision upon the lack of a formal audit, it may be assumed that there was one. The inquiry, then, is, whether the charges in them, now objected to, were legal charges against the county and such as it could be compelled or ought to pay.
The charges for per diem and mileage, while serving upon a committee appointed by the board of supervisors, could not be enforced against the county. The law is plain, that a supervisor may not claim from the county, for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Supervisors of Onondaga v. BriggsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Lee v. MunroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Supervisors of Chenango v. BirdsallNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . FieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Chemung Canal Bank v. Supervisors of Chemung CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1848
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Osterhoudt v. . RigneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Daleview Nursing Home v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Village of Fort Edward v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Board of Commissioners of Huntington Co. v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.