O'MEARA v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.
In this case, we consider the circumstances under which a criminal defendant is entitled to benefit from a new rule of federal constitutional criminal procedure announced by the United States Supreme Court. The precise question we face is whether appellant Timothy John O’Meara’s criminal case was “pending” when the United States Supreme Court decided Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), thus entitling him to the benefit of the rule announced in that decision, namely, that any fact that increases the penalty for a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sawyer v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BlancheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Danforth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.