Utah State Road Commission v. Johnson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ELLETT, Justice:
This is a condemnation matter. The jury awarded damages to the landowner in the amount of $95,000. The trial court ordered a new trial unless the owner would consent to a remittitur in the amount of $3,000.
*217The Road Commission appeals claiming that the trial court had no authority to grant a new trial conditionally. There is no merit to this claim. The appellant has the same right to appeal which he would have had, had the court denied the motion for a new trial outright. The fact that the landowner consented to a reduction of $3,000 does not harm the appellant — it has no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. FisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Duffy v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
- Rotge v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Diversified Holdings, L.C. v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Coronado Oil Co. v. GrievesWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- ProMax Development Corp. v. MattsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- Nelson v. TrujilloUtah Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.