Legal Opinion

Utah State Road Commission v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1976No. 14225PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

This is a condemnation matter. The jury awarded damages to the landowner in the amount of $95,000. The trial court ordered a new trial unless the owner would consent to a remittitur in the amount of $3,000.

*217The Road Commission appeals claiming that the trial court had no authority to grant a new trial conditionally. There is no merit to this claim. The appellant has the same right to appeal which he would have had, had the court denied the motion for a new trial outright. The fact that the landowner consented to a reduction of $3,000 does not harm the appellant — it has no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. FisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  3. Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Duffy v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Rotge v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Diversified Holdings, L.C. v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Coronado Oil Co. v. GrievesWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. ProMax Development Corp. v. MattsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  5. Nelson v. TrujilloUtah Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API