Legal Opinion

ProMax Development Corp. v. Mattson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 25, 1997No. 960684-CAPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

Appellant ProMax Development Corp. (ProMax) challenges the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellees Matt and Sherie Mattson, arguing that (1) the evidence presented at the bench trial does not support the trial court’s finding of intentional interference with contractual relations; (2) the trial court erred in not considering newly discovered evidence, which indicates that ProMax should not be held hable for intentional interference with contractual relations; and (3) even if ProMax is hable, the evidence does not support the amount of damages awarded. The Mattsons…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. C.R. Eng. v. Swift Transp. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  4. U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  5. Bennett v. HuishCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API