ProMax Development Corp. v. Mattson
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
Appellant ProMax Development Corp. (ProMax) challenges the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellees Matt and Sherie Mattson, arguing that (1) the evidence presented at the bench trial does not support the trial court’s finding of intentional interference with contractual relations; (2) the trial court erred in not considering newly discovered evidence, which indicates that ProMax should not be held hable for intentional interference with contractual relations; and (3) even if ProMax is hable, the evidence does not support the amount of damages awarded. The Mattsons…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- C.R. Eng. v. Swift Transp. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2019
- Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Bennett v. HuishCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.