Legal Opinion

Niles v. Rexford

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover on a negotiable promissory note, which was transferred to him by indorsement of the payee named therein after maturity. The case was tried and submitted to the jury on the single issue of whether the note was genuine or a forgery. The verdict and judgment were for the defendant, and the plaintiff excepted. Three questions are presented for review.

During the trial it developed that the affidavit of defense, which on its face bore the signature of the defendant, was in fact signed with the authority and direction of the defendant by one of her attorneys of record,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harponola Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Fudge v. MarquellIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Stevenson v. Hugh Gunning's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  4. In Re Estate of WorkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. State v. ChristieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  2. Meyette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. Greenwood v. LamsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. Bristol, Trustees v. NoyesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  5. Dittmar v. FryeWashington Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API