Harponola Co. v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The action is on a promissory note given by the defendant to one L. W. Watson, a member of the Peerless Talking Machine Company, so-called, payable to P. J. Stover, another member of the company, or his order, and indorsed by the latter to the plaintiff before maturity. The defendant filed an answer setting up fraud in procuring the note and failure of consideration. The trial was by jury. At the close of the evidence the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, to which the defendant was allowed an exception. An exception was also saved to the judgment on the verdict. Other exceptions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Crompton v. BeedleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- Belka v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Howard National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Ayres v. FrenchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fehr v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Proctor Trust Co. v. Upper Valley Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Land Finance Corp. v. Sherwin Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Niles v. DanforthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Alexander v. ChevalierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.