Legal Opinion

Meyette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1939PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.

This is an action to recover damages received in a railroad crossing accident which happened in December, 1936, in the village of Lyndonville.

The crossing is in the easterly part of the business section of the village. The rails of the main line of the defendant run approximately north and south. The crossing is 38 feet long (north and south) and 6 feet wide. . It had no warning bell nor gates but there was the usual crossing sign.

Depot Street, which runs east and west, intersects the crossing at right angles. East of the crossing Williams Street intersects Depot Street but at a varying…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Woodcock's Admr. v. HallockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Wood v. JamesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  3. Bennett v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  4. Johnson's Admr. v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  5. Beatty v. DunnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. SidwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  2. Parker v. HoeferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
  3. Petitions of New England Tel. & Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  4. Johnson v. ConeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  5. Penna v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API