American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Orenstein
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.
We concur in the opinion of Judge Brown, except as to his discussion and resolution of the substantive issue. The reader is referred to Judge Brown’s opinion for the facts in the instant case.
The trial court granted summary judgment because it found the subordination clause unambiguously subordinated Orenstein’s mortgage to that of plaintiff. However, each party on appeal has presented reasonable interpretations of the same clause which are at variance with each other. If the clause is interpreted, as plaintiff suggests, as subordinating Orenstein’s mortgage not only to the interests of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schweiss v. WoodruffMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Patterson v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Savidge v. SeagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Van Slyck v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mitchell v. Trustees of United States Mutual Real Estate Investment TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- TD Bickham Corp. v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Washington v. StarkeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Shapiro v. Merchants Bonding Co. (In Re Wade)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. OrensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978